Q:Are anons trustworthy in general? I tend to disagree.
The Intervention of the Sabine Women (1798). French painter Jacques-Louis David (1748-1825) was the leading figure of Neoclassical painting and, indeed, defined the art of Neoclassicism for the whole of Europe
http://ericwedwards.wordpress.com/2013/08/02/jacques-louis-david-artist-revolutionary-and-revolutionary-artist/
The devil comes in many shapes, and because the devil loves to foment conflict, don`t they tempt you with half-lies that offer an easy solution to a tangled problem?
I usually don`t trust anons; their very choice to remain anonymous is often geared toward that sole purpose of causing damage without consequence, i.e., built-in plausible deniability.
Please exercise reasonable doubt lest the devil takes advantage of your gullibility.
What compounded insult to the mind to suffer damage from one anon and blame the wrong guy/girl to which the blame has been shifted by the perp himself/herself?
Cool it please, ladies: what fine minds are you that should never have had to suffer undue shame such as this!
We the good hearted people are all tormented for your sufferings, the good non-anons and anons alike, who love you and respect you for all the wonderful persons you are!
Let not the devil take any more advantage of your innocence!
댓글 0