The judge held that the XRP token itself is not a security, but the transactions and schemes around trading it need to discuss.
The Judge: "XRP, as a digital token, is not in and of itself a “contract, transaction, or scheme” that embodies the Howey requirements of an investment contract.
Rather, the Court examines the totality of circumstances surrounding Defendants’ different transactions and schemes involving the sale and distribution of XRP. "
알아서 판단해라
난 아닌거같어
비트자리가 좀 거시기하고 생각보다 강하게 뚫어주진않아서 모르겠음
판사가 한 말이 리플측에 그렇게 유리한게 아닌거같음
근데 뭐 그런건 해석에따라 다른거아니겠남.. 이게 펌핑 및 추세전환의 재료로 쓰일거란건 누구나 알고있었던 사실인거고.. 근데 몬가? 몬가임
이걸 먹여주는게 말이안되는거 같긴함