어법상 틀린 것은?


Some say that democracy has temporarily triumphed
because it is economically successful. In democratic
societies individuals can pursue their economic goals in
safety and indeed are encouraged ① to do so. So it
tends to generate economic and hence military success.
Yet there are difficulties in this argument. To begin
with, it is clear ② that democracy does not
automatically generate economic growth. It is possible
to point to periods in the history of democratic societies,
including the recession in the United States in the 1930s,
③ when there was economic decline. Secondly, there
are forms of autocracy, as in China today with ④ its
amazing economic growth, which are temporarily more
successful than most democracies. There are one-party,
bureaucratic states such as Singapore, which has had
extraordinary growth without democracy in the normal
sense of the word. So neither is democracy a guarantee
of growth ⑤ or is it the only path.