[💾 자료] 보좆퀴벌레는 모르는 대처의 나토연설

[댁햄운(9jmfplr4cp8q)]

https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/108106

요즘 보좆갤 대깨트 무지성 고립주의자들이

대처도 고립주의자였다노 시전하길래

그 새끼들 쌉발작할만 한

재밌는 포인트들이 많아서 가져옴

대처파운데이션에 기록된

1990년도 임기 말 대처의 나토연설임

1. Soviet forces are withdrawing from almost all of Eastern Europe. Politically, NATO no longer has a clear front-line. Militarily, the Defence Planning Committee concluded in its recent communique: “The implementation of a CFE Treaty will virtually eliminate the possibility of a surprise attack on NATO.” Not an attack, note, but a surprise attack. In short, things look very different from a year ago. This does not diminish the need for NATO.

- 소련 몰락과 나토의 필요성 감소는 무관하다고 발언

2. I think the simplest explanation for NATO was given by one of its great architects, President Truman: “We hope that it will prevent World War III” , he said, and it has.

But it has done more than that. NATO has surely been the most successful Alliance in history. It has deterred war without ever having to fight a war. It halted the spread of communism.

- 나토를 성공했다고 평가, 나토를 창설한 트루먼 샤라웃

대깨트들은 이제 미민당 대통령 샤라웃했다고

라이노 네오콘 좆버럴 시전 드갈듯

3. And second, we should continue to provide for our defence and our security collectively. Stability in Europe depends upon the Western countries standing together. Were we to let NATO's integrated structure fall apart because the military threat is no longer pereceived as so acute, we should take a big step backwards towards the bad old days of European power politics, pursued ultimately by force.

- 소련 몰락과 무관하게 나토의 존속과 강화를 다시 한번 더 주장함

4. A very important part of this collective approach will be to ensure that a united Germany is a full member of NATO and its integrated military structure. The people of both parts of Germany want that; NATO's members want that; and most of the countries in Eastern and Central Europe want that.

- “통일독일”의 나토 가입을 환영함 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ보좆갤 오열

5. And the third point: we must preserve the United States' presence in Europe—in both conventional and nuclear weapons. President Bush 's strong commitment to America's continuing role is [end p7] is very welcome indeed. The presence of United States forces in Europe is essential to balance Soviet strength, even after recent changes, but more than that, the Atlantic Community, the drawing together of the United States and Europe, is the very heart of NATO. If the price of reconstructing Europe were to be the disintegration of that Atlantic Community, I for one should fear for the future.

- 유럽에 지속적 영향력을 유지하며 “대서양 공동체”를 보존하기로 결정한 “부시” 환영합니다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

6. The second military point: ought NATO to give more thought to possible threats to our security from other directions? There is no guarantee that threats to our security will stop at some imaginary line across the mid-Atlantic. It is not long since some of us had to go to the Arabian Gulf to keep oil supplies flowing. We shall become very heavily dependent on Middle-Eastern oil once again in the next century. With the spread of sophisticated weapons and military technology to areas like the Middle East, potential threats to NATO territory may originate more from outside Europe. [end p9] Against that background, it would be only prudent for NATO countries to retain a capacity to carry out multiple roles with more flexible and versatile forces.

- 이제 소련 퇴물이니 다른 “외부의 잠재적 위협(중동)”을 조심하자 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

7. The second aspect of that political role: we need to help the Eastern European countries feel more secure. By keeping NATO intact, we risk making them feel excluded at the very time that we want to draw them back into the mainstream of Europe, yet NATO cannot itself offer them security guarantees nor is it realistic to think of extending NATO's membership at present. What we can do is to build up the CSCE as the body within which political and security issues affecting Europe as a whole can be discussed. President Mitterrand has spoken of a Confederation of European States. I have myself called for a Great Alliance for [end p11] Democracy, which would one day extend from the Atlantic to the Urals and beyond. I think we are all after the same ive: an area of political stability and economic progress, in which democracy and market economies are firmly rooted.

- 나토를 넘어 유럽 전체에 CSCE 기구를 창설하여 정치 및 안보문제 논의하자

- 나는 “민주주의 확장 동맹”을 추구한다

개쳐발렸으면 이제 제발 좀 찌그러져 있어라

보좆퀴벌레새끼들아

[익명(112.165)]

나토 탈퇴한 건 드골이었지