Hickey: When I started doing Clojure in 2005, I had already been programming for 18 years. So I'd had it. I was done. I was tired of it.
Eventually I got back to scheduling and again wrote a new kind of scheduling system in Common Lisp,
which again they did not want to run in production. And then I rewrote it in C++.
Now at this point I was an expert C++ user and really loved C++, for some value of love
[Audience laughter]
that involves no satisfaction at all.
[Audience laughter]
But as we'll see later I love the puzzle of C++. So I had to rewrite it in C++ and it took, you know,
four times as long to rewrite it as it took to write it in the first place, it yielded five times as much code and it was no faster.
And that's when I knew I was doing it wrong.
고것은 근로저였구요
예상 댓글)
나의 씨플플은 그렇지 않은데 저 새끼가 존나 못해서 커먼리슾으로 짠거랑 성능이 비슷했다
C++11 이전이라서 쓰레기였다 지금은 괜찮다
본문에서 cpp쪽이 좋지 않았다는건 코드 작성 시간인거 같은데.. 성능에 대해서는 더 빠르지 않았다고만 나옴
보통 네이티브로 짜면 성능이 더 좋을 거라고 예상하잖음
다시 보니 헷갈리는 거 같아서 수정했읍니다
근로저도 그렇게 코드 빠르게 짤 수 있는지는 잘 모르겠는디 - dc App
이새끼는 C++도 클로저도 좆도 모르면서 왜 깝치냐
왜 화가 나셨읍니까 선생님