And I have got things to discuss that related with the Latin language.

I do not think that in latin, accent and long/short vowels determine the meaning heavily.

if it doesnt, why every texts in Latin is written WITHOUT long/short vowels and accent?

some people even say that those things are not existed in everyday speech, and we do not need to worry about it at all

when we learn Latin, which I do not really think that it is right.


anyway, the thing that I want to ask you guys are not this one.

My question is:

How did linguists reconstructed Latin phonology? and can we sure that what they reconstructed is able to believe?

I cannot be sure that what modern day linguists say about Latin is 100 percent true.

while nobody wrote his texts with Macrons and accent in that day.

this is only my opinion, but I think this can says that they acctually did not use the rules in real speech,

but in developed Latin literature or poetry in the Golden Era, they made up some rules for rhythm or rhyme

is there any other Linguist(s) who thought like I did? if so, is it one of the popular opinion that very possibly true?

I mean I know that I am not really educated with linguistic, but only have some interests with it,

I searched quite a lot of resources about the language and that is what I got. or maybe I misunderstood with English.

and I think my opinion is still not enough while I found great evidence of it in Wikipedia.

does anyone have an idea of Latin phonology? if so, please tell me