"Let A and Ω be sets, and suppose [that with each element α of A there is associated a subset of Ω which we denote by Eα]."
Is "associated a subset of Ω" grammatical in this sentence?
An anonymous person said that the word "there" is inverted with the noun phrase "a subset of Ω." But I think the pronoun "there" is the grammatical subject of the bracketed that-clause, and the noun phrase "an associated subset of Ω which we denote by Eα" should be the semantic subject of the clause. The noun "subset" would be the head of this semantic subject.
답변: https://ell.stackexchange.com/a/313934/129241
영어 학습자 익스체인지에 질문 글을 올리니 금방 누가 친절히 답변해 주셨어.
Is "associated a subset of Ω" grammatical in this sentence?
An anonymous person said that the word "there" is inverted with the noun phrase "a subset of Ω." But I think the pronoun "there" is the grammatical subject of the bracketed that-clause, and the noun phrase "an associated subset of Ω which we denote by Eα" should be the semantic subject of the clause. The noun "subset" would be the head of this semantic subject.
답변: https://ell.stackexchange.com/a/313934/129241
영어 학습자 익스체인지에 질문 글을 올리니 금방 누가 친절히 답변해 주셨어.
그니까 There goes the bus랑 논리적으로 같은 문장임
그래. 전치사구 'with each element α of A'를 전치[prepose]하고, 존재 there(existential there)를 문법적 주어로 쓰고 나서, 의미론적 주어를 "수동태 be + 동사 'associate'의 과거 분사형" 뒤에 놓은 거지. 이런 문장은 오늘 첨 봤어.
여기에 나온 'there'를 부사가 아닌 대명사로 간주하는 연구자들이 있다는 사실도 여태껏 전혀 몰랐어.
해당 댓글은 삭제되었습니다.
답변자가 찾은 비슷한 추가 예문은 언제 나온 자료의 것인지 모르겠지만, 아마 이런 구문이 수학 문헌에 더 있지 않을까?