2012. 9 월
세계적인 미국 의학협회 학술지
Archives of Internal Medicine 등재 연구 논문
" Acupunchure for Chronic Pain "
결론 :
17922명을 표본으로
EBM 근거 최상위 메타 분석에서
침술이 만성 통증에 효과가 있으며
대조군의 가짜침보다 효과가 있다고 결론
• 논문 설명
http://www.kmwiki.net/xe/43273
• 논문 좌표
http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1357513
• 관련 뉴욕타임즈 기사
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/acupuncture-provides-true-pain-relief-in-study/?ref=acupuncture
---------------
Conclusions
Acupuncture is effective for the treatment of chronic pain and is therefore a reasonable referral option. Significant differences between true and sham acupuncture indicate that acupuncture is more than a placebo. However, these differences are relatively modest, suggesting that factors in addition to the specific effects of needling are important contributors to the therapeutic effects of acupuncture.
Vickers and coauthors conducted a systematic review to identify RCTs of acupuncture for chronic pain in which allocation concealment was determined unambiguously to be adequate.
Individual patient data meta-analyses were conducted using data from 29 of 31 eligible RCTs, with a total of 17922 patients evaluated. Please also see the Invited Commentary.
한까들 이런 논문은 놔두고 엄한거 같고 오지 말자.. 메타 분석 미만 잡이다
굳
내ㅏ예전에 리뷰 열개씩 올릴땐 씹더니 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그리고 relatively modest하다잖앜ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅇㅈ?
However, these differences are relatively modest 여기가 좀 아쉽네
근데 단순 플라시보 이상인 것도 확실
\' 효과가 있다 \' 고 한데서 버로우 해라 혀가 기냐...그리고 addition to the specific effects of needling are important contributors to the therapeutic effects of acupuncture --> 단순 니들링 이상의 효과가 침술에 있다잖아
다른 논문에선 침을 놓는 부위가 중요한게 아니고 침을 꽂는 자체가 효과가 있다던데?? 그 말인 즉슨 혈이란게 필요 없단 뜻 무학력도 할 수 있는게 침술이란 뜻^^