1월에 접수한거 이제서야 리젝나왔네 


리젝할꺼면 빨리 좀 알려주지 ㅅㅂ



근데 궁금한거 있다


1.원래 리젝할때 리뷰어가 무슨내용으로 리젝했는지 에디터가 다 전달해줌?


원래 이럼?



2. decison단계만 두 달이 넘게 걸리고 있길래 1주전에 독촉메일(최대한 정중하게)


보냈는데, 그게 영향이 있었던 걸까?


3. 000000은 다 비밀임 ㅋ


--------------------------------Ms. Ref. No.:  ESWA-D-21-00000

Title:   논문 제목

Dear Mr KIM,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Expert Systems with Applications (ESWA).

As Editor-in-Chief, I inform you that the Associate Editor recommended against publishing your manuscript, and I must therefore reject it.  The Associate Editor’s comments and Reviewers’ comments are found at the bottom of this decision letter.   

For alternative journals that may be more suitable for your manuscript, please refer to our Journal Finder (http://journalfinder.elsevier.com).

We appreciate your interests in ESWA.  
 
With kind regards,

Dr. 0000000
00000000 Professor
Editor-in-Chief, Expert Systems with Applications 
 University
Email: 0000000000


Associate Editor's comments:    

Thank you for your submission to ESWA. We have received advice that this submission is not suitable for publication in ESWA. The comments follow. We hope that you will find them useful in your ongoing research.




Reviewer #1: This is an interesting paper exploring the use of deep learning in predicting 00000000000000000000000000000


.However, the contributions claimed00000000000000000000000000

The claim "t00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000s" is not convincing.


 There are a ton of research in 000000000000000000000000000000000. 


Also, this 0000000000000000was made before the00000000000000000000

This sentence is not clear: "0000000000000000000000000000000"


2.2.3 00000000000000002017): It is not common 0000000000000000000


"In Fig. 3, y0000000000000000000000000." This is not well written and confusing.

The authors claimed "0000000000000000000." What were the accuracies reported?



Reviewer #2: This paper presents a method for forecasting 00000000000000000. 


I cannot see any theoretical development, or remarkably valuable finding, or solid application in expert and intelligent systems since there is no guarantee for the generality of the procedure shown.


1. the method is solidly developed,00000000000000000000000


 The 0000000000000000000000000000s,


2. literature review should be extended to include items from recent years,


3. in section 2.2.2 there is no reference to literature.



끝.