Yes, both Maurice Blanchot and Jacques Derrida mentioned Louis-Ferdinand Céline in their writings. / Maurice Blanchot, in his 1949 essay "How Is Literature Possible?" from the collection "The Work of Fire," discusses Céline's controversial pamphlets. Blanchot grapples with the paradox of a great writer producing both valuable literary works and morally reprehensible political writings.
수고양이무어(dontre)2024-03-22 07:40
Jacques Derrida, in his 1991 essay "This Strange Institution Called Literature," discusses Céline as an example of a writer who challenges the boundaries between literature and politics, noting the tension between Céline's literary innovations and his anti-Semitic political writings.
수고양이무어(dontre)2024-03-22 07:40
답글
저서 중 p51. Our task is perhaps to wonder why it is that so many of this century's strong works and systems of thought have been the site of philosophical, ideological, political "messages" that are at times conservative (Joyce), at times brutally and diabolically murderous, racist, anti-semitic (Pound, Celine), at times equivocal and unstable (Artaud, Bataille).
수고양이무어(dontre)2024-03-22 07:41
답글
와 재밌고 신기하네 이런걸 바로 찾아다주는게. 근데 클로드는 할루시네이션? 그런건 없음? 이 내용 다 그대로 믿으면 되는건가. 맥락도 그렇고 구체적이어서 믿어도 될거 같긴 한데
익명(211.36)2024-03-22 10:21
답글
아래 댓글은 내가 직접 찾은 거임 그래서
수고양이무어(dontre)2024-03-22 11:05
궁금해서 클로드한테 물어보니 이러길래 찾아보니 블랑쇼는 잘 안 나오는데 데리다는 실제로 언급이 보이긴 하네
수고양이무어(dontre)2024-03-22 07:41
답글
감사
말테의수기(artistrainer)2024-03-22 07:47
혹시 언급여부 왜찾는지 물어봐도됨? 셀린 소설 재밌게 읽었는데 데리다랑 어떻게 엮으려는지 궁금
Yes, both Maurice Blanchot and Jacques Derrida mentioned Louis-Ferdinand Céline in their writings. / Maurice Blanchot, in his 1949 essay "How Is Literature Possible?" from the collection "The Work of Fire," discusses Céline's controversial pamphlets. Blanchot grapples with the paradox of a great writer producing both valuable literary works and morally reprehensible political writings.
Jacques Derrida, in his 1991 essay "This Strange Institution Called Literature," discusses Céline as an example of a writer who challenges the boundaries between literature and politics, noting the tension between Céline's literary innovations and his anti-Semitic political writings.
저서 중 p51. Our task is perhaps to wonder why it is that so many of this century's strong works and systems of thought have been the site of philosophical, ideological, political "messages" that are at times conservative (Joyce), at times brutally and diabolically murderous, racist, anti-semitic (Pound, Celine), at times equivocal and unstable (Artaud, Bataille).
와 재밌고 신기하네 이런걸 바로 찾아다주는게. 근데 클로드는 할루시네이션? 그런건 없음? 이 내용 다 그대로 믿으면 되는건가. 맥락도 그렇고 구체적이어서 믿어도 될거 같긴 한데
아래 댓글은 내가 직접 찾은 거임 그래서
궁금해서 클로드한테 물어보니 이러길래 찾아보니 블랑쇼는 잘 안 나오는데 데리다는 실제로 언급이 보이긴 하네
감사
혹시 언급여부 왜찾는지 물어봐도됨? 셀린 소설 재밌게 읽었는데 데리다랑 어떻게 엮으려는지 궁금
크리스테바는 <공포의 권력>에서 셀린 언급하던데