It looks like everyone here only tends to focus on the singularity of technology or bio-techonology, other than economics, so sometimes I feel somewhat sad that no one hasn't ever dealt with that issue in depth. So I'm writing this post to talk about the singularity of economics with everyone here even a little bit into it. I bet classical economics taught at universities might not give good solutions to such problems as are to happen after the singularity, because the life patterns we are currently used to will be unexpectedly totally different from now and such patterns are deciding components that affect economy in various ways, probably even in the future society, so I'd say we mankind should need to make a new economic theory, on the assumption that the future life patterns couldn't be explained anymore by classical economics. I guess the alternative may be behavior economics since it has once been proven to be able to explain economical problems hard to be solved by classical economics. What do you make of it? Couldn't you agree more with me?
Write your opinion on this.
yes
might (x) may (o)
글 전체가 시제 엉망에 뒤죽박죽이네
내가 볼때는 니가 영어를 못하는듯. 시제틀린거 하나도 없어보이고 might 도 may 로 바꿀필어보임. 글쓴이가 might로 적은건 과거라서그런게 아니고 가능성을 낮게보기때문인것같은데.
왜 조선놈들은 같은 조선놈이 영어쓰는거보면 문법부터 평가하려드냐 내용에 대한 답을 안하고 ㅋㅋㅋ
그냥 시제 헷갈린걸로밖에 안보이는데 그리고 앞에 no one쓰고 뒤에 notever쓴거도 틀렸고 젤 마지막 쿠쥬도 쓸이유가 없는데
유튜브에서도 한국인이 서양애 문법 고쳐주고 있는 꼴보면 존나 웃기긴함 ㅋㅋㅋ 그러니 Koreans are so grammer nazis 하면서 비웃지 ㅋㅋ 주입식 영어교육의 폐해인듯. 솔직히 이 글 당장 reddit 에 올려도 아무도 시제니 뭐니 따위 신경 안쓰는데
이중부정은 casual English에서 틀린걸로안본다.. ever부분도 상관없고. 디씨가 에쎄이쓰는곳도 아닌데 왜그러노 시제틀린거 눈씻고찾아봐도 없구만. might를 may의 과거로만 보는건가 ㄷㄷ..
ㄹㅇ ㅋㅋ 레딧들어가면 문법 틀린거 하나하나 고쳐야겟노 ㅋㅋㅋ 글쓴이정도면 양반이지
내가 영어는 잘 모르지만 이건 그냥 시비 거는걸로 밖에 안보이네
영어권에서 살면서 공부 좀 하고 아는척 하던가
행동경제학을 말하는거라면 경제쪽 전공했지만 문외한이라 패스 ㅇㅇ
트라야누스니?
not easy to speculate how our econony would look like after the singularity. Would capitalism withhold? Even this is a mere guess.. infinite possibilities. Probably why it's less of people's concern.
Totally agree. The only thing I can say for sure at this point is about the comparibly nearer future :
The implementation of basic income, a countermeasure to mitigate consumption downfall engendered from mass unemployment which is bound to come after automation becomes standard in industries.
And for how to get the required budget. Robot tax maybe...? What op's opinion? (sorry for hijacking btw)
Sure thing it has to be less of people's concern, since they are only interested in technologies that could make their imaginations come true, and of course, it's not easy to speculate it, but reflecting on how technologies have changed our life so far, we could anticipate, to some extent, how the world will be going on after then.
중학교 작문 수준 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ