내용은 전반적으로 황화구리 상전이에 대한 착각론에 대한 반박인듯

A가 황화구리 상전이가 7K와 108C에서 일어나는 예를 들면서 그걸 착각했을 수 있고,

그게 아니더라도 CuS 미량으로라도 어떤식으로든 나타나는 현상을 설명할 수 있지 않냐고 주장함

B는 그게 아니라고 함. 아래가 B의 결론부임


"

황화구리는 샘플의 전체적인 자장과 전도도를 바꾸지 못해

CuS는 정공 도체(hole conductor)다. 

내가 만약 p+ 도핑한 실리콘을 뿌리면 뿌린 두 곳의 전도율이 매우 낮아질텐데 이는 다이오드 형태(전류가 한쪽으로만 흐를 수 있음)가 만들어지기 때문이다. 

그런데 그런일은 일어나지 않았지

이제 알겠지? 미량의 CuS는 아주 넓게 분포되어 있기 때문에 산화납의 외양을 바꾸지도 않았지

실제 샘플들은 ??? (자기장인지 CuS인지 실리콘인지) 뒤에 있으면 자력이 약해진다 연자성(외부 자기장에 의해 쉽게 생기고 없어지는 강자성)이 발생하지 않는다는거지

"


---


누가 누구한테 한건지 글씨 색깔로는 구분이 안됨 걍 맥락보고 판단해서 A랑 B붙임


A: I have seen through your trick!

Repeat this in red: There's no uneven ferromagnetism that may contribute to the observed behavior of samples


B: Ohh, really? Do you think that being pulled into magnetic field can make a sample levitate?


B: So you cannot.

Thought so. Here I go


A: The incomplete evaporation of sulphur results in sulfide contaminant!


A: Why it occurs in a reaction is not necessary to explain because of Devil's Proof!


A: Sulfide together with copper in the reaction form copper sulfides with phase transitions at

+7 and +108 degC, making observers believe there's superconducting phase transition!


B: So you acknowledge that there's superconductivity the sample?


A: Only took a couple of weeks!


A: Quite the opposite


A: Because of the lack of measurement sensitivity the semiconductor to metal transition was mistaken for super conductivity!


A: That hurt quite a bit huh? And now it will be over


A: Ferromagnetic and diamagnetic areas in the sample make the sample reorient and half-levitate mimicking magnetic torque!


A: Right now whatever you say won't convince me otherwise - it's over!


B: Copper sulfide doesn't contribute to sample bulk magnetic and conductive properties


A: Hhhuh?


B: Copper sulfide is a hole conductor. If I sprinkle some p+ doped silicon, the conductivity between two sprinkles will be very low because you get a diode

But nothing of sort occurs!


A: However! You admit that CuS inclusions exist! It is still possible to explain the phase transition through them percolating by Unknown Method X!


A: Now you would think that! CuS inclusions are so sparse as to not change the optical properties of massicot! 


A: And before you ask: The samples decrease the magnetic field strength behind them. indicating that no soft ferromagnetism occurs!


A: Admit it, Battler! You are incompetent!