https://gall.dcinside.com/mgallery/board/view/?id=thesingularity&no=312115
와 인기햄 막플한테 정면으로 박아버리네이건 좀 큰데?gall.dcinside.comhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12037
Superconductor Pb$_{10-x}$Cu$_x$(PO$_4$)$_6$O showing levitation at room temperature and atmospheric pressure and mechanismA material called LK-99, a modified-lead apatite crystal structure with the composition Pb$_{10-x}$Cu$_x$(PO$_4$)$_6$O ($0.9<1.1$),>arxiv.orghttps://arxiv.org/abs/2308.06256
Single crystal synthesis, structure, and magnetism of Pb$_{10-x}$Cu$_x$(PO$_4$)$_6$OThe recent claim of superconductivity above room temperature in Pb$_{10-x}$Cu$_x$(PO$_4$)$_6$O with 0.9 < $x$ < 1 (referred to as LK-99) has sparked considerable interest. To minimize the influence of structural defects and impurity phases on the physical properties, we have synthesized phase-pure single crystals with $x \sim 1$. We find that the crystals are highly insulating and optically transparent. X-ray analysis reveals an uneven distribution of the substituted Cu throughout the sample. Temperature ($T$) dependent magnetization measurements for $ 2 \leq T \leq 800$ K reveal the diamagnetic response characteristic of a non-magnetic insulator, as well as a small ferromagnetic component, possibly originating from frustrated exchange interactions in Cu-rich clusters in the Pb$_{10-x}$Cu$_x$(PO$_4$)$_6$O structure. No anomalies indicative of phase transitions are observed. We therefore rule out the presence of superconductivity in Pb$_{9}$Cu(PO$_4$)$_6$O crystals, and provide some considerations on the origin of anomalies previously reported in experiments on polycrystalline specimen.arxiv.org저 빨간줄 그어둔 Cu(6h)는 원논문 내용대로면 원래 Cu가 있어서는 안되는 자리인데 막스 플랑크 논문 XRD에서는 포함되어 있다
즉 시료가 잘못되었거나 데이터가 틀렸거나 아니면 그냥 졸면서 썼거나
인기 햄 말은 그 내용이 뭐든 걍 안믿는게 답임
헉
뭐래...
해석추
시료가 잘못된 이유 = 도저희 똑같이 못만들겠으니까 그냥 만들어진걸로 쓴거겠지
독일도 lk99 like