논문 저널에 투고 
-> 1차적으로 에디터가 병신논문 거름 
-> 피어리뷰할사람 몇명 뽑음 (보통 3명) 
-> 피어리뷰한사람들이 점수매기고 의견달음 (억셉/ 매이저리비전/ 마이너 리비전/ 거절) 
-> 억셉은 바로출판/ 리비전은 수정해서 다시 피어리뷰어들한테 검사받음/ 리젝되면 다시못냄 
-> 에디터가 최종 판결

 이 프로세스로 논문 출판됨

지금 리뷰 리포트 못받았다는건 피어리뷰어들 리비전판결도 못받았다는거임

리비전받고 수정해서 다시 검사받는게 한두번으로 안끝나는 경우가 부지기수

여태 논문 작성하는꼴 보면 절대 한번에 억셉안됨

내가볼때 최소 2번이상임

니가 뭘아냐고? 나도 피어리뷰 존나 많이 해봤으니까....

피어리뷰 요청왔던 이메일 전문 개인정보 가려서 올린다...


Dear ~~~

~~ is a peer-reviewed ~~~ journal published monthly by Elsevier. ~~~~ is indexed in many international databases such as ~~~, Elsevier ScienceDirect, etc. According to the ~~~~ latest data issued by Web of Science in ~~~~, the impact factor of ~~~~ is ~~~~, which ranks in Q1 among ~~~~~ journals in the world.

Due to a rapid increase of submitted papers, ~~~~ needs to control the academic quality of accepted papers more strictly and keep the acceptance rate at about 20%. Thus, please perform paper review with a higher standard and we appreciate your contributions!


Given your expertise in this area, I would appreciate your comments on the above paper. I have included the abstract of the manuscript below to provide you with an overview.

If you accept this invitation, your comments will be due by ~~~~. If you are unable to act as a reviewer at this time, I would greatly appreciate your suggestions for alternate reviewers.

To accept this invitation, please click here:

~~~~~

To decline this invitation, please click here: 

~~~~~