νλ μ κ²½λ§μ μκ° λ° μΈμ΄ μμ
λͺ¨λμμ μΈμμ μΈ μ±λ₯μ λ¬μ±νμ§λ§, μ΄λ€μ΄ ꡬννλ κΈ°λ₯μ λν΄μλ μλ €μ§ λ°κ° κ±°μ μμ΅λλ€. ν κ°μ§ κ°λ₯μ±μ μ κ²½λ§μ΄ μ묡μ μΌλ‘ 볡μ‘ν μμ
μ μλΈλ£¨ν΄μΌλ‘ λλκ³ , μ΄λ¬ν μλΈλ£¨ν΄μ λν λͺ¨λμ μ루μ
μ ꡬννκ³ , μ΄λ₯Ό μμ
μ λν μ 체 μ루μ
μΌλ‘ ꡬμ±νλ κ²μ
λλ€. μ΄λ¬ν νΉμ±μ ꡬ쑰μ ꡬμ±μ±μ΄λΌκ³ ν©λλ€. λ λ€λ₯Έ κ°λ₯μ±μ μλ‘μ΄ μ
λ ₯μ νμ΅λ ν
νλ¦Ώκ³Ό μΌμΉμν€λ λ°©λ²μ νμ΅νμ¬ μμ
λΆν΄λ₯Ό μμ ν νΌν μ μλ€λ κ²μ
λλ€. μ¬κΈ°μμλ λͺ¨λΈ κ°μ§μΉκΈ° κΈ°μ μ νμ©νμ¬ λ€μν μν€ν
μ², μμ
λ° μ¬μ νλ ¨ λ°©μμ κ±Έμ³ λΉμ κ³Ό μΈμ΄ λͺ¨λμμ μ΄ μ§λ¬Έμ μ‘°μ¬ν©λλ€. μ°λ¦¬μ κ²°κ³Όλ λͺ¨λΈμ΄ λ€λ₯Έ μλΈλ€νΈμν¬μ κΈ°λ₯μ μ μ§νλ©΄μ μ κ±°λ μ μλ λͺ¨λμ μλΈλ€νΈμν¬λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μλΈλ£¨ν΄μ λν μ루μ
μ ꡬννλ κ²½μ°κ° λ§λ€λ κ²μ 보μ¬μ€λλ€.Β μ΄λ μ κ²½λ§μ΄ ꡬμ±μ±μ νμ΅νμ¬ νΉμν μμ§μ λ©μ»€λμ¦μ νμμ±μ μ κ±°ν μ μμμ μμ¬ν©λλ€.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10884Break It Down: Evidence for Structural Compositionality in Neural NetworksThough modern neural networks have achieved impressive performance in both vision and language tasks, we know little about the functions that they implement. One possibility is that neural networks implicitly break down complex tasks into subroutines, implement modular solutions to these subroutines, and compose them into an overall solution to a task - a property we term structural compositionality. Another possibility is that they may simply learn to match new inputs to learned templates, eliding task decomposition entirely. Here, we leverage model pruning techniques to investigate this question in both vision and language across a variety of architectures, tasks, and pretraining regimens. Our results demonstrate that models often implement solutions to subroutines via modular subnetworks, which can be ablated while maintaining the functionality of other subnetworks. This suggests that neural networks may be able to learn compositionality, obviating the need for specialized symbolic mechanisms.arxiv.org
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10884Break It Down: Evidence for Structural Compositionality in Neural NetworksThough modern neural networks have achieved impressive performance in both vision and language tasks, we know little about the functions that they implement. One possibility is that neural networks implicitly break down complex tasks into subroutines, implement modular solutions to these subroutines, and compose them into an overall solution to a task - a property we term structural compositionality. Another possibility is that they may simply learn to match new inputs to learned templates, eliding task decomposition entirely. Here, we leverage model pruning techniques to investigate this question in both vision and language across a variety of architectures, tasks, and pretraining regimens. Our results demonstrate that models often implement solutions to subroutines via modular subnetworks, which can be ablated while maintaining the functionality of other subnetworks. This suggests that neural networks may be able to learn compositionality, obviating the need for specialized symbolic mechanisms.arxiv.org
μ κ²½λ§μ κΈ°λ₯μ λν κΈμΈκ°? κ·Έ κΈ°λ₯μ μ€λͺ νλ €λ©΄ λ κ°μ§ μ κ·Όλ²μ΄ νμνλ° κ·Έ μ€μμ μλ‘μ΄ μ λ ₯κ³Ό κ·Έ μ λ ₯μ μΌμΉνλ νμ΅ ν νλ¦Ώ(μ΄κ±΄ λμ§ λͺ¨λ₯΄κ² μ)μ μΌμΉμν€λ κ²μΈλ° μ΄λ κ² ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ νμ΅μ λ μνκ² λλ€λ건κ°
κΈμ΄ λ무 μ΄λ ΅λ€..
https://www.noemamag.com/what-ai-can-tell-us-about-intelligence/
λ§ν¬ κ³ λ§λ€. μ΄κ² μ½κ° μ κ²½λ§μ΄ κΈ°νΈλ Όλ¦¬ν κ°μ κ²μ λ°°μΈ μ μλ, μλμ κ΄λ ¨λ μ£Όμ ꡬλ. κ·Έλ¬λ©΄ μ§κΈ μ¬λ¦° λ Όλ¬Έμ κ·Έ μ κ²½λ§μ΄ ꡬμμ±μ΄λΌλ κ²μ νμ΅ν΄μ κ·Έλ° μμ§μ μΈ κ²λ€μ λ°°μ°μ§ μμλ λλ€λ λ§μ΄λ€. λλΆμ μ΄ν΄κ° λκ² κ°λ€
μ κ²½λ§μμ μ΄λμ λ 체κ³μ μ¬κ³ λ°©μμ΄ νμ±λμ΄ μλ€λκ±Έ νμΈνλ€λ λ Όλ¬Έμ
λ μ 보 κ°μ¬ν¨