런던에서 발표한건데 ai 능력중에 기억은 빠져있음 해결 못해서 안넣은건가 모르겠는데 레딧 댓글 보면
Surprised to not see ‘memory’ featured in this list.
They’re probably considering it a component of ‘personalization’ given the way Altman spoke about it in the recent Lex podcast.
I also wonder if that’s an intentional ’rebranding’ decision in response to certain demographics (more ‘AI-doomer-leaning’ people) being apprehensive or fearful of long-term memory.
Memory is basically solved. It's a matter of available compute.
Yeah I’m aware, I just mean under their given heading of “what’s next for [consumer-facing/available] AI”
Interestingly, when Sam talked about memory and personalization, he said something to the effect of “I imagine that would be great” when obviously they can (and likely do) already use that capability internally. I suppose that disparity is something they don’t want people thinking about though (“AGI achieved internally!” etc.) so it’s easier to just ‘imagine’ how useful memory would be ?
이러던데 장기기억은 대충 ai 개인화 하면 자기 컴퓨터에 개인 기억으로 남기 때문에 문제 없다고 보는듯??
아님 걍 해결 못해서 안넣었거나
댓글 0