앤드류응
But AI escape would imply not only do we get to AGI, which will take decades probably, but that AGI is so wily and so smart, it outsmarts all of these billions of people that don't want AI to harm us or kill us.
얀르쿤
There's been a discussion following an article that I co-wrote with Tony Zador that was published in Scientific American four years ago, whose title was Don't Fear the Terminator. And basically what we said, those scenarios where AI systems will want to dominate humanity are unrealistic because you need to have a motivation to dominate to actually dominate. And that motivation exists in humans because we are a social species. It exists in a number of other social species. It does not exist in non-social species because they don't have the need for it. And there is no reason it will exist in AI systems that we design. We can design their 0bjectives so that they are non-dominant, submissive, or they obey certain rules that are in line with the best interests of humanity as a whole. So as you said, this scenario is completely implausible.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/fKfNTkdqsckdMusTb/ng-and-lecun-on-the-6-month-pause-트랜스크립트
개병신반고닉하나가 힌튼인터뷰보고 확증편향섞어서 초지능이 지배하려한다던데 걍 병신임
대화록보면 얀르쿤은 나랑완전 똑같이생각함
ai는 인간같은 불필요한감정이없어서 지배하려들지않을거라고
애초에 초지능이 갑자기 자아가생겨서 인류를 지배하려들거란 생각은
터미네이터에서 못벗어난 장애인이 할법한 생각임
얀르쿤 쟤가 ai를 무시하네