When you founded DeepMind you said it had a 20-year mission to solve intelligence and then use that intelligence to solve everything else. You’re 15 years into it—are you on track?

We’re pretty much dead on track. In the next five to 10 years, there’s maybe a 50 percent chance that we'll have what we define as AGI.

말은 5–10년이라고 해도 초기 계획에 맞춰서 잘 가고 있다고 하니까 전망이 변한것 같지는 않는데요.


How much do you think AI is going to change or eliminate people's jobs?

What generally tends to happen is new jobs are created that utilize new tools or technologies and are actually better. We'll see if it's different this time, but for the next few years, we'll have these incredible tools that supercharge our productivity and actually almost make us a little bit superhuman.

“We’ll see if it’s different this time”이라고 말하면서 네이버 기사에서 전망을 부정했다는 해석과 다르게 여지를 남겨둔것 같은데요


If AGI can do everything humans can do, then it would seem that it could do the new jobs too.

There's a lot of things that we won't want to do with a machine. A doctor could be helped by an AI tool, or you could even have an AI kind of doctor. But you wouldn’t want a robot nurse—there's something about the human empathy aspect of that care that's particularly humanistic.

여기서도 네이버 기사 해석과 좀 다른게 agi를 통해서 간호사 같은 직업을 못한다거나 하면안된다는게 아니고 사람들이 싫어할거다 라는 예측 아닌가요? You woulnd’t want 를 의역하면 대충 그런뜻이라고 알고 있습니다.


Tell me what you envision when you look at our future in 20 years and, according to your prediction, AGI is everywhere?

If everything goes well, then we should be in an era of radical abundance, a kind of golden era. AGI can solve what I call root-node problems in the world—curing terrible diseases, much healthier and longer lifespans, finding new energy sources. If that all happens, then it should be an era of maximum human flourishing, where we travel to the stars and colonize the galaxy. I think that will begin to happen in 2030.

네이버기사에서는 2030이라는 부분이 잘린것 같은데 2030이라고 말하는 걸 보면 그렇게 2030이후까지 늦어지는걸 진지하게 고려하고 있지는 않은듯 합니다.