VANCE: JUDGES CAN’T CONTROL THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH—IT’S ILLEGAL


“If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal.


If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that's also illegal.


Judges aren't allowed to control the executive's legitimate power.”


Source: X


배경:


LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump's political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome.


Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence.


The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees.


This is lawfare at its most brazen: a raw, partisan power grab dressed up in legalese. If allowed to stand, this decision sets the precedent that any left-wing judge can unilaterally strip the President of his authority and hand it to the administrative state. That is not democracy. It is not law. It is judicial dictatorship.


While the order is currently set to last only a week, no serious person believes this won’t be extended if the courts think they can get away with it. The Trump Administration should treat this for what it is—an unconstitutional usurpation—and consider defying it outright. No judge has the authority to cripple the executive branch and hand power to unelected bureaucrats.


Beyond that, the Supreme Court must intervene and overturn this blatant violation of constitutional governance. Judge Engelmayer should be barred from hearing any future cases related to executive authority, and every Democrat lawyer who enabled this attack on the Constitution should be sanctioned.


This is not a legal dispute—it is a coup by the judiciary against the elected government. And it cannot be allowed to stand.


뉴욕주 판사가 재무장관도 재무부 데이터에 접근하지 못한다는 판결을 내려서 큰 반향을 일으키고 있는데


한국의 유희왕 판사를 연상시킨다.


공수처가 공문서 위조하고 관저 진입한 거나, 구속영장 발부 기준이 완전히 자의적인 거나


사법부 신뢰 훼손을 넘어서서 사법부도 척결 사정권에 들어가는 듯


한미 모두 비슷한 양상


의회 점거와 서부지법 항쟁도 비슷한 면이 있고


이렇게 됐다는 건 전반적으로 사법부 개혁, 삼권분립 체제 재구성 등이 더 미룰 수는 없는 과제가 됐다는 걸 말하는 듯.


사법부도 직업관료들이다 보니 생각해보면 ‘딥스화’되기 매우 쉽다. 한 번 알박기하면 아무도 못 자르고


선관위 관련 안건도 국민의 눈이 다 쏠려있음에도 헌재가 모두 기각한다는 건 usaid처럼 분명 뭔가 있다는 인상을 준다.


미국은 그래도 뛰어난 개혁파가 있으니 이렇게 한 번 휩쓸면 극단으로는 안 갈 것 같은데


한국은


전광훈 개신교 + 김건희 vs 하루종일 내란거리며 피를 토하는 병신 찢빠와 민주견들, 나라를 망친 민주견들


ㅅㄱ가 웅장해진다...