- 109. Telegram 218 From the Embassy in Iran to the Department of State, January 14, 1971, 1445Z [Get Acrobat Reader PDF version ]
MacArthur warned that the Shah, indignant over the consortium's delay in meeting with OPEC Persian Gulf producers, was threatening unilateral OPEC cutbacks.
Source: National Archives, RG 59, Central Files 1970-73, PET 3 OPEC. Secret; Immediate; Exdis. Repeated Immediate to Beirut, to Tripoli, London, Paris, the Hague, Caracas, OECD Brussels, OECD Paris, NATO, Jidda, Kuwait, Dhahran, Tokyo, Bonn, Rome, Brussels, and Algiers.
- 111. Telegram 277 From the Embassy in Iran to the Department of State, January 18, 1971, 1632Z [Get Acrobat Reader PDF version ]
Under Secretary Irwin reported back to President Nixon and Secretary Rogers on his meeting with the Shah, in which the Shah lobbied for a separate Persian Gulf oil agreement rather than the OPEC-wide deal that the companies sought.
Source: National Archives, Nixon Presidential Materials, NSC Files, Box 602, Country Files, Iran. Secret; Nodis. Repeated to Jidda, Kuwait, Dhahran, Tripoli, London, The Hague, OECD Paris, and EC Brussels. In a telegram dated January 18, following his discussion with Amouzegar, Under Secretary Irwin recommended to the President and Secretary Rogers that the oil companies negotiate a regional oil agreement for the Persian Gulf. (Ibid., RG 59, Central Files 1970-73, PET 3 OPEC). Further documentation on the Irwin Mission is scheduled for publication in Foreign Relations, 1969-1976, Volume XXXVI: Energy Crisis, 1969-1974.
-- 112. Telegram 301 From the Embassy in Iran to the Department of State, January 19, 1971, 1510Z [Get Acrobat Reader PDF version ]
Ambassador MacArthur summarized his briefing with the consortium negotiators, in which he recommended concessions on the scope of the oil agreement.
Source: National Archives, RG 59, Central Files 1970-73, PET 3 OPEC. Secret; Immediate; Exdis. Repeated to London, Kuwait, EC Brussels, Dhahran, The Hague, Jidda, OECD Paris, Paris, and Tripoli. In Telegram 302 from Tehran, January 19, the Embassy reported a consortium representative's remark that Amouzegar had been convinced by his talks with Irwin that Washington agreed that Gulf oil negotiations should proceed before consortium talks with Mediterranean producers began, a view which MacArthur himself seemed to share. MacArthur protested, "I gave company reps Iranian viewpoint firmly held by Shah and Amouzegar, that negotiations should proceed first with Gulf group� For them now to imply to their principals that this position (consistently held by Shah) is result of Under Secretary's talks here yesterday and my own views today seems self serving and rather devious." (Ibid.)
-- 125. Telegram 1935 From the Embassy in Iran to the Department of State, April 15, 1971, 0817Z [Get Acrobat Reader PDF version ]
Ambassador MacArthur alerted the Department that the Shah hoped to bridge the gap between the recent Persian Gulf oil settlement and the more favorable terms that Libya had just secured.
Source: National Archives, RG 59, Central Files 1970-73, PET 3 OPEC. Confidential. Repeated to Dhahran, Jidda, Kuwait, London, and Tripoli.
-- 139. Telegram 4377 From the Embassy in Iran to the Department of State, August 10, 1971, 0850Z [Get Acrobat Reader PDF version ]
Ambassador MacArthur noted that since Iran strongly advocated producing country interest in all aspects of the oil industry, it was likely to play an "active but moderating role" in formulating OPEC participation policy at the next meeting.
-- 155. Telegram 7307 From the Embassy in Tehran to the Department of State, December 23, 1971, 1300Z [Get Acrobat Reader PDF version ]
The Shah outlined the extensive changes he would demand in his government's relationship with the oil consortium once the current concessions expired in 1979.
Source: National Archives, RG 59, Central Files 1970-73, PET 6 IRAN. Confidential; Exdis. Repeated to Algiers, Dhahran, Jidda, Kuwait, London, and Tripoli.
https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/frus/nixon/e4/c17625.htm
출처는여기
눈으로보고 픽한거라 흘린게 있을지모름
근데 팔레비도 열심히 자국이익을 위해 싸우긴한듯
댓글 0