(K-Ship stands for Hell Chosen type shipping companies.)
If you are from Songchul companies where conflicts can usually be solved with conversation, you might ask why wouldn't you just tell the problems to people so that they can self-evaluate and fix it.
First I would like to tell you that the definition of 'resolving conflict' in K-Ship is surprisingly different from what it is from other Songchul companies which indivisualism have been maturely settled down.
In totalitarianism like workplaces in K-ship, resolving conflict means finding out ones who made conflict or raised an issue so that they can get punished.
The process is usually like this: Find the one who did the wrong so that we can punish him, and let him take all the responsibilities! Just sent one to the hell, now justice stands tall. Problem solved.
Even if you successfully get into the conversation and you start to speak logically, your opponent will start to nitpick every single minor mistakes you make, in order to make your logic 'seemingly useless' to others.
Therefore the larger context is ignored.
The word 'Seemingly' is important here since people in K-ship would judge the winner of conversation by the criteria of 'effectively disparaging the opponent' regardless of the facts and logics used.
And what makes this even worse is that with such criteria that people in K-ship have in common, conversation will easily become personal attacking contest a.k.a. ad hominem.
In conclusion, the true conversation to solve conflict cannot exist in K-ship.
Rather there exists endless dirty contests of ad hominem.
What?