선요약: So, the short answer to the question is no, Azov is not a neo-Nazi regiment.
1. Neo-Nazi regiment/brigade /battalion Azov?
Informal preamble. I am forced to talk about Azov to foreign journalists from different countries, from India to Brazil, almost every day. Now, against the background of the terrible humanitarian situation in Mariupol, which is being heroically defended by the Azov fighters, I react quite emotionally when the conversation begins, let’s say, with the question: “So to which extent is Azov really a threat?” However, it is important to remember that it is most likely not the person’s fault, that one doesn’t know something, doesn’t understand, or doesn’t know how to critically analyze the information. The fact that the person asks, in my opinion, should be seen as a conscious invitation to enlightenment that should be used.
First of all, when someone, for example, a journalist, asks about the Azov Regiment, I think it is worth finding out what he generally knows about Azov, how does he know about it, and why the question about this unit of the National Guard actually arises. Among Western journalists and everyone who thinks they know something about the “Ukrainian crisis”, almost always the question of “Azov” arises. However, if you ask, a few can even articulate what exactly worries them and where did the reasons for this concern come from.
Most often you have to deal with two options: a) everyone talks about Azov, every media writes about it; b) it is mentioned by Russians in the context of the “denazification”. In the first case, in my opinion, we should limit ourselves to the statement that the media excitement feeds itself: the media write about Azov just and in most cases only because the media write about Azov. It’s just an obsession that is not worth reacting to.
In the second case, we should clearly articulate the absurdity of the idea that any Kremlin assertions have some basis. No one in the right mind would look for the basis for Russian assertions about bio laboratories producing the weapon capable of hitting only ethnic Russians. If the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia claims that Russia did not attack Ukraine, no one will check whether there is really a war going on in Ukraine. Western audiences should just get used to the idea that Russia and its officials are lying, just lying, without any grounds, every time they open their mouths. It is difficult to realize this for a Western person, but it is necessary.
In the cases discussed, it makes sense to limit yourself to the statement that Azov is one of the units of the Ukrainian National Guard, which is right now, while the inquirer is satisfying his curiosity, protecting the civilians of Mariupol from extermination. In most cases, this will be a sufficient answer. It only makes sense to include the details discussed below, when the inquirer really knows something about the subject under discussion.
진짜 몇번째 하는 이야기인지 모르겠는데 아니라고
- dc official App
반박도 없이 인신공격하는놈들보단 낫다 ㅇㅇ
https://m.dcinside.com/board/war/2551078
이것도 보는중 ㅇㅇ
아조프 대해 관심 많아보이던데
https://ccl.org.ua/en/claims/euromaidan-sos-honest-answers-to-the-most-common-questions-about-azov-in-the-west/
이거 읽어보셈 저자부터가 러시아출신 유대인 - dc App
고맙다 ㅇㅇ
오렌지마멀레이드 재미있게 봤었는데
동명 소설이나 만화잇음? - dc App
웹툰있음
부대마크나 바꾸고 변명하면 좋겠네
부대마크는 전쟁끝나고나서 바뀌지않을까 예상중 - dc App
러뽕은 괜찮은데 고작 깃발 하나는 못참지 ㅋㅋ
사단 마크를 국방군도 아닌 무장친위대걸 그중에서도 씹메이커 2사단걸 고대로 가져왔는데 아~ 나치 아니라고~ 러뽕aut! ㅋㅋㅋ 씨발 푸틴이 탈나치 어쩌구 지랄하는것도 씹지랄이지만 간판에 대놓고 "우린 그냥 낙지도 아니고 상낙지 중 상낙지요"라고 박아놨는데 눈가리고 아웅도 씨발 적당히 해야지 정신 차리라