https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/proportion-of-battlefield-casualties-caused-by-certain-weapons.966257/
Wounds recorded in "The Illiad":
Spears: 72.1% (80% mortality)
Swords: 11.5% (100% mortality)
Slings: 8.2% (42% mortality)
Arrows: 8.2% (66% mortality)
Source: William Pietrzak, "Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration", 2008, p. 7
Medieval Japanese wounds recorded in "Records of Loyal Military Service" (exact date unstated):
Arrows: 73%
Swords: 25%
Spears: 2%
Another smaller study (with 173 records instead of 1,000+ as in the above) stated:
Arrows: 87%
Swords and naginata: 8%
Rocks: 3%
Spears: 1%
Source: Karl Friday, "Samurai, Warfare and the State in Early Medieval Japan", 2004, p. 132
14th century Japanese wounds recorded in "Records of Loyal Military Service":
Arrows: 68.6%
Other projectiles (e.g. rocks): ~22%
8% swords
2% other
Source: Peter Haskel, "Sword of Zen: Master Takuan and His Writings on Immovable Wisdom and the Sword Taie", 2012, p. 22
16th-17th century Japanese wounds recorded in "Records of Loyal Military Service":
Firearms: 44%
Swords: 3.8%
(others not listed, though the author does note that spears and rocks, in that order, were both much higher on the list than swords)
Source: Ibid
Wounds among officers and NCOs in a selection of French companies at the Siege of Rouen in 1562:
Firearms: 59%
Rocks: 33%
Pikes: 6%
Artillery: 2%
Source: J.B.Wood, "The King's Army: Warfare, Soldiers and Society during the Wars of Rel1igion in France", 1996, p. 115-116
Wounds among French soldiers in two companies in 1567:
Swords: 53.6%
Firearms: 30.7%
Rocks: 10.2%
Pikes: 3.9%
Arrows: 1.6%
Source: Ibid
1715 Paris Invalides records for wounded men:
Infantry small arms: 71.4%
Swords: 15.8%
Artillery: 10%
Bayonets: 2.8%
Source: John Lynn, "Giant of the Grand Siecle: The French Army, 1610–1715", 1997, p. 489
1762 Paris Invalides records for wounded men:
Infantry small arms: 68.8%
Swords: 14.7%
Artillery: 13.4%
Bayonets: 2.4%
Source: John Muir, "Tactics and the Experience of Battle in the Age of Napoleon", 1996, p. 46 (both this and Lynn's seem to reference the same source, Corvisier)
American Civil War casualties:
Infantry small arms: 94%
Artillery: 5.5%
Edged weapons: 0.4%
Source: Ibid
European and American casualties in wars from 1800 to 1850:
Infantry small arms: 30-40%
Artillery: 40-50%
Edged weapons: 15-20%
In wars from 1850 to 1900:
Infantry small arms: 85-90%
Artillery: 8-10%
Edged weapons: 4-6%
Source: Trevor Dupuy, "Handbook on Ground Forces Attrition in Modern Warfare", 1986, p. 55
British and German casualties in World War I:
British wounded:
Artillery: 58.5%
Infantry small arms: 39%
Grenades: 2.2%
Edged weapons: 0.3%
German wounded:
Artillery: 43%
Small arms: 50.9%
Grenades: 2.6%
Edged weapons: 0.6%
Other: 3%
German killed:
Artillery: 54.7%
Infantry small arms: 39.1%
Grenades: 1.3%
Edged weapons: 0.3%
Other: 4.6%
Source: Alexander Watson, "Enduring the Great War Combat, Morale and Collapse in the German and British Armies, 1914–1918", 2008, p. 15
American casualties in World War II:
European Theater:
Artillery: 64%
Small arms: 23.4%
Other: 12.6%
Pacific Theater:
Artillery: 47%
Small arms: 30.7%
Other: 22.3%
Mediterranean Theater:
Artillery: 69.1%
Small arms: 14%
Other: 16.9%
Source: Office of the Surgeon General, "Department, United States Army. Wound Ballistics for World War II", 1962, p. 76
American casualties in the Vietnam War:
Small arms: 31.8%
Grenades, mines, and booby traps: 27.4%
Aircraft crashes: 14.7%
Artillery: 8.4%
Other non-combat: 17.4%
Source: Vietnam War Casualties and Cause; data compiled by William F. Abbott from figures obtained shortly after the construction of the Vietnam War Memorial.
맞는지는 모름
군충장 연구들 수치 가져왔나보네 일본은
하튼 좋은자료 ㅊㅊ
일본은 왜그런지 모르겠는데 저 시대에 자료가 1000건이 넘네;;
그거 하위 부대 소대장들이 자기네 전공 인정받으려고 윗선에 보낸 보고자료(군충장)들이 엄청 많이 살아남아서 그래
왜 중세 중기는 일본거밖에 업ㅅ는 것임
퍼온거라 몰라
현대적인 대포가 1900년대부터 여서 그런가 그 뒤로 완전 아티월드네 항공기 가진 국가들은 항공기 cas 피해도 높을 줄 알았는데
CAS로 보병 제압하는 것은 아무래도 제한적인 것일까..
군충장 하니 전에 창상이 창에 찔린 상처가 아니라 자상이라고 하던 분탕 생각나네 추