문제는 이거였고

정답은 "유의미한 rcs의 변화는 없을 것이라 추측됨"임

이 주제로 뭐 찾다가 외국 f-16net에서 같은 이야기 하는거 보고 군갤에도 문제 내 봤음




근거 :



In FY17 the program will begin to produce a third variant of the missile labeled the AIM-9X Block II PLUS (Block II+) to meet survivability requirements inherent to the 5th generation aircraft platforms. The Block II + will be procured only for specific critical mission area and the balance of the AIM-9X inventory will be continue to be produced as regular Block II missiles to meet munitions requirement. In FY17 the missile will also incorporate the obsolescence redesign of the control actuator system battery into both Block II and Block II+ variants.

The nomenclature used by the Prime Vendor for contracting purposes distinguishes the 3 types of AIM-9X missiles as such: AIM-9X-1 is the designation used for the AIM-9X Block I missile. AIM-9X-2 is the designation use for the AIM-9X Block II missile. AIM-9X-3 is the designation used for the AIM-9X Block II Plus missile.


f-35의 파일런과 런쳐는 모두 스텔스 형상이고, 장착되는 무장인 aim-9x block 2+도 5세대기 생존성을 저해하지 않는다(만족시킨다) 명시되어 있음

영국은 아스람 사용하지만 그거도 비슷한 모양임